Why the Bradley-Prosser “Choking” Investigation is So Prolonged
Overheard at brunch in Madison, WI; retiree attorneys (Democrats) conversing…
Attorney 1: “I’ve worked with Prosser for years. My politics was completely different from his, entirely different. But he was always very calm and composed. My politics was on the other side, but when you met him on the street, he was always very pleasant.”
Attorney 2: “Well, every one of us has a veneer. Under pressure, the veneer cracks and the real person comes out. His veneer must have cracked.”
Attorney 1: “I never saw his veneer crack in 20 years.”
And yes, these were Democrats speaking.
The same conversation included a discussion of how the investigation on which Justice assaulted which Justice could not conclude with pointing a finger at either Justice– this would discredit the entire Wisconsin Supreme Court tremendously.
Yet, what are the options?
Pretend it did not happen?
Hope it goes away?
Censure the guilty Justice and let her/him continue judging after being proven a liar?
What about the witnesses who backed each Justice? They are Justices, too, and clearly some of them lied – should those supporting the guilty Justice also be censured?
Even if a “choking” did occur, what was Justice Bradley thinking when failing to use legal channels, but leaking this story to Madison’s liberal press, to Bill Lueders, of the Soros-funded Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism? Is this how the Supreme Court handles legal complaints?
According to County Supervisor Eileen Bruskewitz:
“The claims against Prosser are suspicious on their face, since they were not reported for more than a week after the incident took place. In addition, eye witnesses have reportedly stated that Bradley was the aggressor and Prosser was simply defending himself.”
If Justice Bradley did indeed attack Justice Prosser with raised fists, then leaked a lie to the press about the incident a week later to discredit Justice Prosser with increasingly common Alinsky tactics used by Democrats, and another liberal Justice supported her lie, should both be censured or fired and Governor Walker allowed to appoint 2 more conservative Justices? Who was the Justice supporting the lie? Was it Supreme Court Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson? How would the nation’s unions take to the dismissal of 2liberal Justices? Would there be rioting in Madison?
If Justice Prosser and his 3 witnesses, all Justices, lied, should 4 Justices be censured/fired? What would the aftermath of this be in Madison and nationally?
No wonder the investigation is taking so long.
No outcome can be good.
Let us pray that truth prevails.