Translation of FFRF “Quit the Catholic Church” NYTimes Ad or It’s Not Easy Being Free From Religion
Translation of FFRF ‘Quit the Catholic Church” NY Times Ad
or
It’s Not Easy Being Free From Religion
The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) published a full-page ad in the New York Times on Friday, March 9, 2012. The ad mocks and demonizes the leadership of the Catholic Church, while inviting “liberal” and “nominal” Catholics to join FFRF.
It begins:
.
.
The logic behind spending $52,000 in an attempt to recruit from a group (the Catholic Church) whose beliefs are diametrically opposed to one’s own group’s (radical atheists) is questionable at best. The ad comes across either as an excuse to spew bigoted hate speech and ridicule towards the Catholic Church, or as a sign of desperation and instability in FFRF.
TRANSLATION of the FFRF New York Times ad:
We at FFRF have been laboring for decades (for two generations), trying to wipe out all mention of religion in the United States.
Ours has been a difficult road fraught with obstacles, and progress has been slow.
After all these years, our membership only represents 0.003 of 1% of America’s population.
Even fellow atheists keep their distance from us; only 1 out of 1,000 U.S. atheists have joined us.
Imagine, the other 999 out of 1,000 atheists tolerate Christian America (80% of America), and even join them in the more secular aspects of celebrating their holidays! It makes us sick to our stomachs to watch people buying Christmas trees and buying toys for their children each Christmas.We valiantly try to spread our creed in any way we can imagine.
We have tried to appeal to people’s intellects, asking them to be “free” thinkers, to question what they are taught and to conclude that we are right; that there is no God.
We have tried to put up golden plaques in State Capitol buildings at Christmas, calling on people to reject gods and to join us in celebrating the pagan Winter Solstice. Unfortunately, no takers.Our Christmas plaques have informed people that their hearts are hardened by religion and that their minds are enslaved by religion. Yet people do not flock to us. They still put up a Christmas tree in the Capitol rotunda that dwarfs our signs by orders of magnitude, and they dare to call it a CHRISTmas tree, as generations of their ancestors have done.
We are working hard to sue Christians who profess their faith publicly, but most of our lawsuits are defeated. People claim that the Constitution guarantees them the freedom to express their religion publicly, not what we claim, the right not to see any religious beliefs expressed anywhere by anybody except us (atheists are classified on most US campuses as religious organizations).
Even the Constitution makes it hard for us; the Founding Fathers used the term freedom OF religion instead of freedom FROM religion. You can’t imagine how hard that makes our battle.We are a modest outfit, with only 4 employees and a $500,000 per year budget. There is just so much a tiny group can do with that. We are really doing our best. Our staff and budget is smaller than the average Christian Church’s staff and budget in Madison, and we are only one group, contrasted with almost 300 Churches in Madison.
So it’s not easy. We can’t sue everybody. We try to single out small communities with small budgets (like Marshfield, a small WI town that hardly has any cell phone coverage), and we sue them whenever their teenagers try to pray on a sports field or their teachers hang the ten commandments in a hallway.
We hope that they will stop expressing their beliefs out of fear of our lawsuit which they cannot afford. That way, we do not have to go to court and risk losing the case, or use up our meager budget. But people have no sympathy for us. They don’t understand our pain. They accuse us of jousting at windmills.
It’s been getting harder and harder. Now more people have noticed what we are up to. Organizations have turned up which help small communities when we try intimidation by litigation. Outfits like the American Center for Law and Justice help the small outfits we try to sue.
Oh, we’ve valiantly tried many things, including suing against the National Day of Prayer. We fought for 3 years, but lost that one. People just seem to insist on praying and praying.
In our desperation, we have turned to ridicule. Last Christmas, we ridiculed the birth of Christ. We put up a fake “Nativity Scene” at the
Wisconsin State Capitol. It was a modest effort, reminiscent of the shoebox dioramas we make in grammar school. But, heck, we don’t have the budget that some of those Christian groups have. Little attention was paid to our ridicule efforts, and nobody flocked to join our creed, which is based on the negation and the ridicule of the beliefs of others. Quite a few Madison bloggers laughed off our efforts — life is so hard when nobody takes you seriously!FFRF's mockery of the Nativity
Now, we are at our wits’ end over our lack of success in recruiting more than 0.003 of 1% of America to our membership in all these years. Golly, we can’t even expand our ranks biologically; so many of our members do not have children at all, have children who reject our beliefs, or are members who promote and practice abortion. You have no idea how hard it is for an organization to expand amongst radical abortionists!
The last straw came when the world’s most famous atheist admitted last month that he is not sure whether God exists! What’s an atheist to do? It’s just too depressing.
S0 we had a brainstorm.
We looked for an organization that has it all.
An organization whose creed is followed by the largest number of Americans.
An organization whose membership embraces half the population of Madison.
An organization whose national membership is growing.
An organization which has the best schools in the United States. And the best hospitals. And the best charities.
(Unfortunately, we have no schools or hospitals ourselves. We can’t do everything!)
An organization which encourages having children and is successful in passing on beliefs.
Yes, the Catholic Church!
We will recruit from the Catholic Church!
We will steal members from the Catholic Church!And what is the best way to do that?
With an ad in the New York Times, of course!So here’s the ad.
Low budget, of course; remember, we don’t have a big budget.
Like the “Nativity” mocking Christ’s birth, we threw it together ourselves.
Never mind that it’s not very professional.That doesn’t matter.
Never mind that it ridicules a quarter of America.
Never mind that 80% of America is Christian and may not like our tactics.
If we lie enough and ridicule enough, maybe we can steal just 0.025 of 1 % of their membership.
That would double our membership overnight!
Heh, heh, heh, wink, wink, wink, drool, drool, drool, what a great plan!
This will really work!Our next group to target for ridicule and recruitment will be Islam…
let’s see how that works out…



Our Christmas plaques have informed people that their hearts are hardened by religion and that their minds are enslaved by religion. Yet people do not flock to us. They still put up a Christmas tree in the Capitol rotunda that dwarfs our signs by orders of magnitude, and they dare to call it a CHRISTmas tree, as generations of their ancestors have done.
We hope that they will stop expressing their beliefs out of fear of our lawsuit which they cannot afford. That way, we do not have to go to court and risk losing the case, or use up our meager budget. But people have no sympathy for us. They don’t understand our pain. They accuse us of 


Syte Reitz grew up in Queens, New York, in a family of Lithuanian immigrants who fled Nazi and Soviet domination during World War II. Her education includes a Ph.D. in Biochemistry, and post-doctoral work at Princeton University. Syte left her job as an Assistant Professor at Oakland University, Michigan, to devote herself to raising her children, and ultimately homeschooled them through the end of high school. She is a member of Madison's Cathedral Parish.



[...] Article FROM http://sytereitz.com/2012/03/translation-of-ffrf-quit-the-catholic-church-nytimes-ad-or-its-not-easy… SPONSOR- Christian Games for kids-fun and faith based curriculum GET YOUR FREE PASS [...]
I do not agree with the contraception stand of the Catholic church. I agree even lesswith your ad. You have damaged your image far more than you realize. You have aroused nominal catholics to feel sorry for the church. They have ignored the ban on contrception for years and years. They are not going to leave the church over it. Use your heads the next time.
RedRover-
You seem to have confused me with FFRF!
I am a faithful Catholic blogger, and this article was a parody of FFRF’s NY Times ad, poking fun at the ad.
I wholeheartedly agree with you, FFRF did not use their heads.
I also agree with Catholic Church’s stand on contraception; I’ll have to write a blog article elaborating sometime.
The Church’s policy is a lot more logical than you might think.
Thanks for your comment and God bless,
Syte
I had the same problem with my satire, which is critical of both sides cranking up the rhetoric. Some people took it literally. One of my commenters put a link to this piece in. It was pretty well executed. I think FFRF is onto something in their attacks on the a clergy housing allowance, which is really abused, but suing Chick-Fill-A for giving a dollar off for bringing in a church bulletin ?
I love your parody. I was ridiculously offended by this ad, which was its purpose–so in that sense, it worked on me. The kinds of appeals FFR makes for “people to leave,” etc., are just a pretext to spew a little hate around. Bigotry rots the brain, so no doubt they feel it’s an awesome ad; and the truth is, it probably brings in a little money from the crowd who read it and think “isn’t it all true?” I think that’s the real audience, actually–those who hate the RCC and want their prejudices reinforced.
Well done!!! Funny and completely ignorant. True Parody can get no better. The misrepresentation of Dawkins is priceless – thanks for that. Did you know he lives off slavery as well!!!
…
…
SYTE’s REPLY TO BRAD S. –
Despite your sarcasm and name-calling, apparently you can still only find one “misrepresentation.”
Even on that one, you are wrong: Dawkins recently admitted publishing that on a scale of 1 (God definitely exists) to 7 (God definitely does not exist), Dawkins himself was a 6. That means that Dawkins is not completely sure.
See video at http://sytereitz.com/2012/02/worlds-most-famous-atheist-not-sure-whether-god-exists/
Syte
Syte, nice shootin’ pardner!
FFRF is just trying to keep state and church separate. We have a presidential candidate who “vomits” at that concept and a Catholic Church that wants their dogma set the rules for everyone. At least FFRF has a sense of humor, which the post above does not.
…
…
SYTE’s REPLY TO SARAH V:
You should not misquote JFK or Santorum.
If you believe that your neighbor should not steal from you or murder you, then you believe in a role for Judeo-Christian principles in our government.
JFK’s absolute statement, ““I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute,” introduced the idea that faith is not allowed in the public square in any shape or form. This would exclude the participation of 80% of Americans in our democracy, and would contradict the inalienable rights given to us by God on which our Constitution is based.
You should read JFK’s speech and Santorum’s explanation of why the speech made him feel sick before you over interpret and accuse anyone.
Regarding sense of humor, apparently your taste leans toward meanness and ridicule.
God bless,
Syte
I did not think I was misquoting either JFK or Santorum, but here is what they said.
JFK: “I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute.”
Santorum: “Kennedy for the first time articulated the vision saying, no, faith is not allowed in the public square. … To say that people of faith have no role in the public square? You bet that makes you throw up.”
You can also cite Thomas Jefferson who wrote in 1802: “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, … I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a WALL OF SEPARATION BETWEEN CHURCH & STATE.”
I agree with JFK and Jefferson. You agree with Santorum. The marketplace of ideas allows all views to be aired. The Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on interpreting the Constitution using past precedence as a guide.
…
…
SYTE’s REPLY TO SARAH V:
Yes, of course, we can disagree and go back and forth arguing and quoting those who support us.
That’s the beauty of democracy.
But my point is that in a nation comprised of 80% Christians who have the freedom to vote what they believe, it is not possible to keep the separation of church and state absolute.
The 80% WILL vote for thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal….
These issues- freedom to exercise religion, yet refraining from religion dictating government- are difficult to balance.
As long as we are not legislating a particular religion or set of beliefs, you have to go by the Constitution, which guarantees the free exercise of religion (which includes voting according to your beliefs) and the acknowledgement that there are inalienable rights granted to us by God (life, liberty and property). Voting one’s moral beliefs makes common sense. If you throw out all moral authority altogether, there will be arguments for killing, for stealing, and for chaos.
One practical illustration of the inextricable intertwining of religion and government in the United States is illustrated by the fact that the Supreme Court recently upheld the National Day of Prayer.
Also, our laws represent the moral authority for which we have all voted and on which the majority agrees; and they ARE based historically on Judeo-Christian moral beliefs.
Bravo, Syte . . . BRAVO!
[...] suing primarily small communities who cannot afford the litigation costs to fight FFRF, and too timid to tackle Islam. FFRF seems to focus primarily on Catholicism (note their signs in the photo opposing Catholic [...]